Sunday, March 27, 2011

Film review: the Social Network (2010)

BOTTOM LINE: Skillfully written with excellent performance combined with expert David Fincher film touch, "the Social Network" is a joy to watch, even though the Facebook origin story is given more drama and color version of real life it is based on.

Good:There is something quite satisfactory to go to a movie when you know Director is at the top of his game and the only question is how ride it will get. David Fincher is once again with a topic that might be an unlikely source for entertainment. Screenwriter Aaron Sorkin has graced the history of the creation of social networking web site Facebook, but in so doing, fashioned a tale humorous plot, drama, treason, and pleasure. So impresses is that between the Sorkin script and direction of the Fincher, they create not only a fairy tale character fascinating, but actually create the Harvard World lifestyles for students, and what was to be there. You can really feel and perceive the world created for this film, and although it was seven years ago, it is indeed as a film by period, largely because technology has changed much since then and really notice you.

Jessie Eisenberg is fettle as founder of Facebook Mark Zuckerberg. His speech rampant and fast-paced, combined with a glaze determined and targeted effectively deliver a performance of a character of engineering; It is not nice at all, but it is imminent watchable. Justin Timberlake is a revelation: Napster founder Sean Parker. It glides his way: Parker slick and cool with relative ease. Andrew Garfield is excellent as Eduardo Severin, financial director and partner of Zuckerberg. And Armie Hammer has the dual role of twins Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss allege that Zuckerberg stole their idea. The interaction of all these characters is almost Shakespeare in nature, except that anyone does kill one, and in this regard, it is great fun to watch. The Social network is another triumph by Director David Fincher and is worth the trip.

Bad:As any stories based on real life, the fiction is more interesting than the truth. Some aspects of the chronology is correct, but more colourful and dramatic interactions are probably not true. In many respects, the film is so well done that it does not matter, but it is sometimes difficult with movies based on real life events where freedoms are taken with the facts. Light apparently straightforward way of Zuckerberg's objectives to the detriment of any person which is on its way, even those who support this make him a character very unlikeable, and isn't the film gain any notion of the real man that this film is based, and how it has changed the world.

Related Post:



No comments:

Post a Comment