Saturday, February 12, 2011

Film review: Chloe (2009)

BOTTOM LINE:Equipment is bland and the threat of the story is never operated satisfactorily, but Chloe is supported by performance fine, a haunting musical score and images elegantly presented make a movie very bad mood and drama.

Good: Even if this is the kind of story that has been said a million times, Chloe has the merit to generate a very haunting atmosphere as history Catherine (Julianne Moore) Stewart covers trying to discover her husband David (Liam Neeson) infidelity by hiring escort Chloe (Amanda Seyfried) to test his loyalty. Early on, the film is an exquisite quality of the emotional and haunting musical score, the carefully compound images that are rich in color and depth to the very three three-dimensional representations of its protagonists. The film uses these elements to create a story which begins in one direction, but occurs then in another. In this regard, Amanda Seyfried showed fine acting skills as she turns a professional and clinical escort in to something more menacing and ultimately sad. Julianne Moore is the centre of this room, and she wears with strong conviction. Scripted motivations can sometimes be arguable, but do you still believe. Overall, Chloe establishes a clearly defined mood makes for a very strong viewing experience.

Bad: This story is far from original. One might even call clich?d. You know almost exactly how the whole movie will play. To this end, it is quite disappointing that threat moments which are alluded to throughout of the film, which appear to be building something of climate, is to reveal the decidedly anti climactic. Course, the filmmakers wanted to do something more subtle, so it was not a "Fatal Attraction" scenario, but the end absolutely need some extra punch. Liaison between Catherine and ChloƩ in the middle of this film is a little stretch of a motivation, perspective as Catherine uses Chloe experience to the touch, that she lost her husband; seems to be a good way to gather the girls on screen, rather than to present something more realistic. In addition, Liam Neeson seems strangely ill placed in this film, and it does not appear to be a good match with Julianne Moore, despite his presence high screen. His character is more or less in the background most of the film not in any way which is probably a wise move account account of this problem.

This article was viewed 29 (s).
Submitted the: 20 December 2010

Related Post:



No comments:

Post a Comment